The GTX 750 Ti supports DirectX 11.2 but only feature level 11_0. Maxwell sets its focus on energy efficiency and was able to outperform the predecessor Kepler and AMD chips in similar performance regions. It is based on the first generation of the Maxwell architecture, namely the GM107 chip. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a mid-range desktop graphics card that was announced early 2014. And Geforce fx 5200 is good for its ability to run newer games in good qaulity such as Doom 3.But the Ati 9200 has over passed The Geforce Fx 5200 with doom 3 and Unreal Tournament 2004, but Half life 2 and HaloCE blew it away.Īll trademarks used are properties of their respective owners - Forum Graphics and Contents © 2001 - 2019 3dfxzone.NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ► remove from comparison Personally, I think you should just buy one that will get the job done and that will run most games in good graphics.ATI has its good side of good prices for the graphic cards, but most of the cards are kind of bad.
#Nvidia geforce4 ti 4200 vs nvidia geforce fx 5200 pro
I see you live in Romania so I don't know if there is a greater price difference there or not.Īsus P4P800 i865PE | Intel 3.2 GHz P4C | 2048 Mb Kingston PC3200 Dual Channel DDR SRAM | 160 Gb Western Digital SATA HD | NEC ND-3520 16X DVD-RW | WinXP Pro SP2 | ATI Radeon X850 Pro | 6-channel AD1985 audio CODEC | 3Com 3C940 Gigabit LAN | Diamond Monster 3D II 24Mb SLI I think that card will be a lot more compatible with the newer games than the 9200. The 9600 supports DirectX 9 and OpenGL 2.0. An even better choice would be the 9600 Pro-128Mb card is $107. At they have one for $94 which isn't much more than the 9200 is. If you are open to a different choice, I would suggest buying a Radeon 9600-128Mb card.
The FX5200 does not perform well in games so I don't like that card either. BTW, what ever you do, DO NOT buy a 9200 SE card. I don't think you should buy a 9200 because it's outdated now and has no DX9 support. Actually for that money you could buy used graphics card like geforce4 ti4200 which could blow away all 5200's, 5600's of fx series.ġ28MB ASUS V9280S TVD SUPERFAST MB PC800 SAMSUNG RDRAM pixelshader 2.0 on fx5200 is totally useless because it's too slow to use it. Nvidia geforce fx5200 is a total crap for playing purposes, ati 9200 card is much better than that one. So the fact that you've got no DX9 support with this card is only logical. Radeon 9200 is like it's predecessor, the Radeon 9100, based upon the Radeon 8500 core (and not on the core that the Radeon 96 use).
all games worked and still radeon 9200 has an bigger "score" well maibe is 9200 good but for games i think NVidia rocks what about the last 6800 card of them.
The test was finaly made with fx5200 128ddr 8x you think that if the GeForce had 128mb it could do much better ? hmm to bad i couldnt take bouth cards with 128mb. This is a realy hard question dont you think? to buy a Ati Radeon 9200 that will run some games very good and other games will aint run ? or to buy a GeForceFX 5200. everything from the test worked not as good as with the ati card but worked Geforce Fx 5200 (64mb): it seems to have all of that :)Īl 4 games worked, pixel shader 2.0 test worked. Home ~ Profile ~ Register ~ Active Topics ~ Members ~ Search ~ FAQ ~ ĪTI Radeon 9200 (128mb): doesnt have dx9 and pixel shader 2.0 support
0 kommentar(er)
